State Filings Archives - Page 4 of 4

California Personal Auto Filings: Avoiding the Pitfalls

Any companies with a personal auto program in California who haven’t submitted a rate or class plan filing within the last couple of years may be in for a surprise when they submit their next filing.
Personal auto filings have been coming under increased scrutiny by the California Department of Insurance (“the Department”) as the state has taken a stricter view of the existing personal auto regulations. This is likely in part due to the pressure from Consumer Groups to ensure that the premiums charged to consumers are fair and are not excessive.
Most notably, ProPublica published a report stating that poor and minority communities face significantly higher premiums than their counterparts in more affluent neighborhoods. Although the validity of the results has been questioned, the ProPublica report has brought this issue to the forefront, which has caused the Department to take a closer look at zip code rating. Other Consumer Groups have also raised concerns about other items in personal auto filings. All of this combined with the Department’s internal review has resulted in changes that will have a material impact on personal auto filings in California. Many companies are learning this the hard way by submitting California auto filings without taking into consideration the latest changes made by the Department.

Unfamiliarity with Changes Can Result in Undesirable Revisions

If your company is not aware of the latest requirements for California auto filings, you may be required to make significant, unexpected changes during the filing review process. These could include costly revisions such as reducing rate levels below proposed rate levels; reducing existing fees used with the program; revising rates charged by zip code without consideration of the competitor information; revising class plan factors to be consistent with the Department’s request; or paying for a consumer group’s intervention on the filing.
In order to make sure that possible changes required during the filing review will be in your company’s best interest, companies should review the pros and cons that could result from submitting a filing.

Consumer Group Intervention

A review of California rate change filings shows that many companies file rate changes of +6.9%. This is due to the regulation stating that the commissioner must hold a rate hearing upon timely request by a Consumer Group for a rate change that exceeds +7% in a personal lines filing. However, filing a rate change less than +7% will not prevent a consumer group from intervening in the filing if they think the proposed rates are excessive or unfairly discriminatory, even if the filing is for a proposed rate decrease. Also, the commissioner at his discretion can decide that a rate hearing is necessary for any rate change including ones below +6.9%. That said, the Department does its best to mediate between all parties involved in the filing so that a rate hearing can be avoided. For rate increase filings at or above the +7% threshold, the Department and the Consumer Group must be satisfied with the support for the proposed rate change to avoid a rate hearing.
The following link contains a list by year of the filings that have been intervened on by consumer groups, along with the cost that was paid by the insurance company.

Beware of the Recent Change in the Filing Review Process

One of the biggest changes that has occurred is with the Frequency and Severity Band assignments by zip code. Even if you are not proposing changes to these class plan factors, the Department will require a review of them, which is likely to result in needed changes. This review will need to be done strictly in accordance with regulations, including the requirements for use of an alternative dataset for any zip codes that lack credibility. Companies should also be aware that the Department has been relying more heavily on the indications from the sequential analysis and the proposed factors need to be consistent with the indications for all class plan factors, including class plan factors where the company may not have been intending to propose any changes.
Companies should also take note of the following items regarding the review of rate filings:

All rate changes must be within the range of allowable changes for each coverage;
Calendar year or calendar quarter data derived from the development triangles should be consistent with the corresponding data in the trend exhibits or it will be questioned by the Department; and
Fee amounts charged to policyholders may need to be supported based on underlying expenses even if no changes are proposed, particularly if the fees are high.

The above are just some of the most important items when it comes to a California personal auto rate and class plan filing. As always, it is important to stay abreast of the latest changes in the California auto filings review process.

What You Don’t Know Might Hurt You

In complex jurisdictions like California, it’s smart to partner with experts who can provide insurance filing support that helps you carefully navigate the regulatory environment. For example, the Department regulations have been amended to reflect the new 21% federal corporate income tax rate, effectively lowering the maximum allowable rates for all P&C lines subject to Proposition 103. Excessive rates may not remain in effect under California regulations. If your company needs to take a rate decrease, you should be filing one. The Department does annual reviews of the financial results of all companies by line of business and has required companies to submit filings supporting that their filed rates are not excessive.
To assist you with personal auto programs and avoid the pitfalls of filing in California, work with experienced consulting actuaries who have a complete understanding of the Department’s latest positions and whose insurance filings support service includes an active dialog with the Department. Look for partners who have assisted other insurance companies in achieving the best possible results on filings that have been intervened on by consumers groups.

Knowing what to expect in California can put you ahead of the game. Perr&Knight can help.

How to Get Commercial Lines Rates Approved in Highly Regulated States (CA, FL, NY, TX, WA)

by Michael Covert

For insurance companies with nationwide products, getting your commercial lines rates approved in heavily regulated states can lead to frustration, confusion and wasted resources. There’s a reason certain states have earned their reputation for being difficult: their requirements are complex and thorough.
This article outlines the most important steps you should take when tackling submissions in highly regulated states to obtain speedy approvals–so you can get on with your business.

Know Your Filing Requirements

Each state has specific requirements that must accompany your filing. Understanding what is and is not required for each state and line of business is key to a timely approval. Carefully examine state filing requirements like return on equity exhibits (which support expenses and profit load), actuarial memorandums, making sure any forms with rate impact have corresponding rates in your manual, understanding the allowable rating flexibilities if any, and how they differ by state, etc. For example, in Florida, many commercial lines rate filings are considered “informational” and don’t require support to be filed, just maintained internally.

Actuarial Transmittals

California, Florida, New York, and Texas require specific transmittals. Every state Department of Insurance expects the filer to fully understand all requirements before submission. Some common transmittals for these states are the California Prior Approval Rate Applications, New York’s Rate Filing Sequence Checklist, the Texas Exhibit L and related actuarial transmittals, and the Florida Rate Level Indications Workbook, Actuarial Memorandum and Actuarial Opinion requirements (only for lines of business where Florida filings are not informational).
Filling out these exhibits is generally very difficult for someone without extensive filing experience. Completing these documents incorrectly can lead to numerous Department questions or disapproval. In worst case scenarios, poor or incomplete submissions can upset Department staff, possibly making it more difficult to receive approval in the future.

Actuarial Support Required

The actuarial support required for your filing depends on whether your proposed program is new or a revision. If support is not supplied in the way the specific Department requires, your filing will likely be disapproved and have to be resubmitted. This can add to cost, slow down your timeline and make it more difficult to get approval after resubmission.
Detailed actuarial support/data is generally required for filing revisions with rate level impact. For new programs, detailed competitor support using approved filings in the specific state is often required. Using filings from other states as competitive support will usually not be acceptable.

Responding to Department Objections

When it comes to state filings, it’s best to know your state requirements inside and out, since it is likely you will receive multiple filing questions before approval. Each Department asks different types of questions and each Department is looking for specific responses based on the type of submission. Don’t back yourself into a corner by responding incorrectly or supplying too little (or too much) information during the interrogatory process.
Departments of Insurance are savvy. Reviewing state filings is what they do, day in and day out. The challenge you face is that Departments have very specific requirements and it is difficult to determine the specific details necessary to satisfy their unique stipulations. This is where working with professional insurance support service providers can be a huge help.
When managing filings in highly regulated states, insurance industry experience is invaluable. Many of the clients we help involve situations where the company has submitted a filing incorrectly in one of the above states and requires assistance sorting out the resulting obstacles. Usually, the company’s support data was insufficient or their actuarial transmittals were filled out incorrectly. Completing your filing incorrectly without realizing it ultimately complicates things as you may not know which aspect of your filing needs to be adjusted. It then becomes a difficult puzzle to solve which variables require correction. Each of these steps impedes the process, burning through time and resources.
Outsourcing to insurance experts who have deep experience in the most difficult states, as well as relationships with regulators at the Department of Insurance, streamlines the process and saves you from a costly and lengthy correction and resubmission process. Experts make sure you go through the process methodically, checking and double checking the necessary support before you submit. This will save time and money on the back end, helping to achieve speed to market.

Speed-to-Market Tips for New Product Development

by Karen Barrett Daley

Speed to market is always important when it comes to introducing new insurance products. In general, all companies require efficient insurance product development, but in certain cases it’s non-negotiable, such as when a company wants to enter into an emerging market and quickly gain market share, when program business is being moved between carriers and they can’t risk a lapse in coverage, or if an existing carrier is trying to accommodate a large account that has an immediate additional coverage need.
As decades-long providers of insurance product consulting for hundreds of insurance companies across every jurisdiction, we have determined the actions that can significantly impact the speed at which a new product is rolled out.

Here are some important tips to accelerate new product development:

Know your market.

Understanding your market means a couple of things. First, know who your competitors are. Examine who’s writing, what they’re covering and charging, their profitability and their market share. Next, get to know the environment from a regulatory standpoint. Look closely at how the Departments of Insurance (DOIs) treat the line of business in the states in which you will be writing.

Confirm that your company is licensed to write the new product.

Sounds obvious, but plenty of insurance companies rush past this step and pay for it later. Amending your certificate of authority is a lengthy process and, as such, needs to be addressed early on by someone familiar with the company licensing process. Double check first, so as not to waste time and resources on stalled product development.

Flesh out your coverage and check for consistency.

Once you have conducted research and developed product concepts, draft the policy forms, then calculate the rates and premium that will be charged. Make sure your form contains clear, unambiguous and, if possible, tested language, your rates balance competitiveness and adequacy, and your rates and forms are consistent, i.e. that they make sense together.

Ensure your product is compliant in the states you want to write.

It is unlikely that all states will allow you to write the exact product you want. Rather, you will likely need to modify the product, at least a little bit, in each state in which you write. Before filing or implementing your product, conduct a thorough compliance review on both rates and forms, making adjustments as necessary. Shortcutting this crucial step in the product development process will likely result in delays, rejections or time-consuming questions from DOIs.

Be smart about your state filings.

Before starting the mechanics of the filing submissions, you should strategize about how to optimize the outcome of your state filings. Learn about and consider incorporating any rating flexibility that is available in your states to create a more robust rating manual. Take advantage of confidentiality rules to prevent competitors from seeing every aspect of your rating model or underlying support. Determine the priority order of filing submissions by considering DOI turn-around times, filing laws, filing support requirements, desired launch dates and projected premiums by state.
When it comes to releasing a new product quickly, the single most important rule is this: approach insurance product development in an organized manner. Cutting corners will almost always result in re-work and undue delays on the back-end.
Product development is a process that requires expertise in many different insurance-related specialties and extensive industry knowledge. If your in-house teams are not equipped to handle the time-consuming specifics or manage the critical details, partner with an insurance product consulting firm whose industry, marketplace and compliance experience can get your product to market quickly and cost-effectively.

To learn more about how Perr&Knight helps insurance companies release new products intelligently, download our Product Expansion Services brochure.

Expert Tips to Speed Up State Filings Approvals

by Perr&Knight

by Courtney Hughes, JD, CPCU, Manager, Regulatory Compliance
There are many reasons to try to expedite your state filings approvals. Whether you are changing rates, launching a new product, or updating a product to meet your customer’s needs, speed is critical in today’s immensely competitive insurance market.
Obtaining approvals quickly is a huge competitive advantage. Bureau filings, in particular, can be especially difficult to keep up with, because new circulars and info come out every day. For ISO, AAIS or other bureau-based products, staying on top of the frequently-changing requirements gives you a significant edge over companies that are lagging behind. For independent products, it’s all about getting your new product or coverage to market before your competitors.
Speedy approvals can help lighten your workload by ending that process sooner, allowing you to focus your attention on the next big project. Here is a list of useful tips that can help you avoid the stumbling blocks that slow down state filings approvals.

Get prepared before submitting.

Thoroughly research the filing requirements for the states in which you plan to file well in advance of your target filing date. Understanding and complying with these requirements up front avoids the issue of states coming back to you requesting that you correct avoidable procedural issues, such as providing the wrong edition of a required transmittal document. Issues like this can delay your approval by weeks.
You can obtain current information from state department of insurance (DOI) websites, SERFF or your insurance consulting services partner. For bureau adoption filings, make sure you have collected and organized all the information from the circulars before you begin so you can provide the states with all necessary pieces of information, like the ircular number, bureau filing number and state filing number.

Submit compliant, complete, and consistent material,

Reviewers can’t approve filings that are not in compliance with their state laws. Every time they kick your filing back with questions, it slows down the time to approval. Make sure that your product development staff and actuaries, or your insurance consulting services partner, confirm that the forms, rates, and rules you plan to submit are in line with state requirements. Not all objections or issues can be prevented, but where possible, anticipate the state’s requirements for your product and try to answer any expected questions in the explanatory memorandum you submit with your filing.
Completed material also goes a long way in speeding up approvals. For example, some states require a form usage rule in your manual for each form submitted. By providing the form usage rules in your manual at submission, you avoid the objection coming in and having to scramble to create the form usage rules and get internal stakeholder approval before the deadline.
Finally, consistency is important because it makes your filing easier to review so it is more likely to be approved quickly. After the forms, rates, rules, and supporting documentation have been developed, take some time to review them carefully. Make sure, for example, that your program name is consistent between the documents, or that your explanatory memo is not referring to a form you decided not to file.

Submit your objection responses ASAP, but always before the due date.

DOIs like to speed up their workflows too, so give them everything they need to close the filing as soon as it becomes available. If you received an objection with a due date in a week, submitting your response by that deadline is good, but submitting it within two days is even better. And always be sure to respond to the state by the due date they set. If you know you will not be able to respond by that due date, contact the DOI analyst and request an extension. If you miss a due date, there’s a good chance your filing will be disapproved or rejected, putting you back to square one.

Have a plan for objection responses and status checks.

Staying on top of filings once they have been submitted is challenging because there are lots of moving pieces to manage. You need to keep track of DOI questions and their due dates and ensure that you are consulting the right internal teams for answers. You will also want to keep track of when filings have been submitted so you know when it is time to check in with the DOI to see how their review is progressing. Before you submit, you should have a plan in place for how you will keep all of the outstanding filings organized.

Use tracking software designed for insurance.

When you have a clear insurance software tracking system in place instead of a hodgepodge of spreadsheets, databases, SharePoint, and/or emails, you can easily keep track of DOI questions and due dates. The more seamlessly you can manage the questions the reviewer throws at you, the sooner you can get the ball back into their court.

Avoid double work.

Review your internal systems to make sure they’re not slowing you down. If you use an ad hoc tracking process, you are likely doubling up on data entry, entering the information once in SERFF and again in your company’s tracking system. This can cause delays in your ability to respond to reviewer questions or use the time of valuable internal resources who could be focused on the next project. Evaluate your company’s state filings process, looking for areas you can streamline. Working with an outside insurance consulting partner can help reveal inefficiencies that you might overlook.
There are never any guarantees with state filings approvals. But preparation, planning, and organization can mean the difference between a product that is launched on time, and one that gets lost in a maze of questions and confusion.

If you have questions about strategies to speed your company’s state filings approvals, our team of insurance experts can help.

Expert Tips to Avoid Accident & Health State Filings Form Rejections

by Susan Cornett

State filings form rejections waste your company’s time and money. When you are forced to resubmit your forms, your company is on the hook to resubmit state filing fees (where applicable) and SERFF fees. These fees might be nominal in some cases, but if you are required to resubmit multiple forms in multiple states, they can range from a few hundred to thousands of dollars. Depending on the state, when you resubmit, you also run the risk of re-starting the approval clock from zero. This can result in delays of weeks or months, and lost revenue due to delayed insurance product releases.
During our decades providing state filings services, we’ve seen almost every reason a form is likely to be rejected. We also know that many of these setbacks are avoidable. Here are some of the most common mistakes that lead to rejection–and what you can do to prevent them.

Tip #1: Pick the appropriate type of insurance (TOI)

When you file through SERFF, you must specify the correct code for the exact type of policy you are submitting. In most cases, a sub-TOI is also required. These codes are crucial because they let the department know what to expect when reviewing your forms. The reviewer evaluates your form through the lens of your selected TOI, looking for particular information. A wrong TOI code subjects your form to review under the wrong classification and may result in unnecessary objections. It can also make your submission look sloppy. Submitting a filing under an incorrect TOI is one of the fastest ways to get your form rejected outright.
NAIC publishes updated codes every January. Each state’s DOI has the authority to control the number and types of insurance codes that they accept each year. Depending on the types of policies issued in their states, commissioners can “turn on and turn off” codes at their discretion. Insurance consulting companies that offer state filing services regularly review these changes, looking for new codes that apply to emerging products and codes that are no longer in use.
But what if your policy doesn’t exactly fit a particular TOI? No matter whether your product is an exact fit or not, you must pick a TOI code. For policies that don’t exactly match a particular state’s TOI code in SERFF, select the code that most closely aligns with your policy, then address individual points of variation in the filing description. Unfortunately, there are no guarantees that a reviewer will read your description, but it’s your best course of action. If you’re unsure about which TOI to select, work with an experienced insurance consulting company that specializes in state filing services. They’ll help you evaluate the code that most closely applies to your form.

Tip #2: For group policies, correctly identify your market

Selecting the correct group designation (“employer,” “union,” “association,” etc.) is hugely important. Your form is subject to rejection if the designation is incorrect or does not match what is allowed in a particular state. As with correct identification of TOI, the self-designation sets the lens through which the reviewer will check your forms. If you are missing required accompanying forms (i.e., association by-laws) for a particular type of group designation, your filing is likely to be rejected.

Tip #3: Pay close attention to the requirements of each state and line of business

Checklists, transmittals and certification requirements vary by state and by line of business. Health-specific plans that are subject to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) require additional considerations, including form and rate requirements and other ancillary forms. It’s easy to get lost in the weeds. You must have a clear understanding of the questionnaires and filing certifications required by each state. These requirements are usually–but not always–listed on SERFF. Pay attention to these details. Missing or incomplete information will stop your filing in its tracks.

Tip #4: Include required information–and nothing more

Pay close attention to the specific information that should accompany each filing. Include what is required by SERFF but do not include additional information. Doing so can open your filing up to questions and confusion.
The sheer volume of work required to track filing requirements that change frequently and vary by state can present challenges for internal departments at most insurance companies. We recommend working with an insurance services partner who provides detailed content reviews as part of their state filings services. Their breadth of experience and deep understanding of all specific statewide filings can save you time, money and runaround.
When it comes to avoiding state filings form rejection, the most important thing is to take your time. Hasty work leads to oversights and careless mistakes that can set your filing back to square one.
Have questions about your state filings process? Contact us today to speak to our state filings experts.